In my dealings and daily interactions I’ve consistently had to reconcile my political leanings with the age group I apparently belong to.
It’s not particularly fun to be a 22-year-old college student and a Republican. I’m constantly the “unenlightened one” whose politics are drenched with the blood-red saturation of a Kansas upbringing and little if no personal or critical thought.
The accusations are not true of course (so says the “unenlightened one”), but what about my party? I have never wanted to be a blind ideological protégé of my elder GOP counterparts.
Tea party member I am not, but the Grand Old Party has consistently teetered on sheer cliff of being only the party of “No” but more specifically the party of “Not if it wasn’t our idea first.”
Those who perpetuate the “party of no” mantra continually point to the recent health care debate as evidence of the Republicans as the negative Nancy’s in the room.
Fifteen years ago Republicans shot down health care by then First Lady Hillary Clinton and yet did nothing over those 15 years, as they grew in power, to get a grasp on the problem that they knew existed.
Now it’s “no” after inflammatory “no” to the concept of health care reform and even Rush Limbaugh says the health care system works just fine recently as he left the hospital with a luxurious health insurance policy in his pocket no doubt.
More understandable are Republicans who wish to break down the health care behemoth bill to smaller, more manageable and intelligent parts, but last week’s health care meeting seemed mum on specifics.
Democrats clamor that total reform is needed now – the battle cry of the inefficient – but then are given ammunition when Republicans, in a partisan fashion, object to points in the Democrat legislation they would otherwise espouse as their own.
Although they should not compromise on bills that are blatantly presumptive in cost, coverage and efficacy, as I’m afraid the current Democrat bill is, being the stubborn angry child in the discussion will hardly be effective in the long run.
Cardinal Newman once said, “To live is to change, and to be perfect is to have changed often.” A little game change and positioning may actually pan out for Republicans this fall and in 2012 if they are willing to suck it up.
Republicans may very well be the party of “No” and “Not if it wasn’t our idea first,” but with every naysay should be a rebuttal confident in the facts without inflammatory remarks and inaccuracies.
“No” is not an answer but rather a preamble.

